Restoring clinical reality to molecular diagnostics, defining the parameters of RT-qPCR, and preventing elegant laboratory science from being weaponized to drive administrative narratives.
This is a wonderful article - demystifying the hyperbole and speculation surrounding the PCR conspiracies.
It is so well articulated, for a lay person like me, to understand the nuance involved in qualifying the argument, and clarifies the misconceptions that have muddied the waters.
Most grateful for your time, effort, and intention to re-introduce solid foundational explanation to a bewildering subject. /\.
Hey David! This was probably one of the more helpful things that Ive come across in this space, and so I subscribed here!
My son is 3 months old, so our situation is a bit different in that he's not even in school or daycare. Is there a similar framework for those who will be opting out of some of the childhood vaccines, versus the Covid jab?
„From the moment the mysterious illness known as SARS was declared a global threat to health, virologists were racing to develop a diagnostic test. Alison Abbott visits the tiny German lab that got there first.“
-
... and ff to SARS-Cough 2
Yes, Corman-Drosten et al designed a test based on a rumor
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
PCR should never again be used to determine a pandemic or health care crisis or underwrite healthcare mandates as a European Appeals court has already stated. SR40 is neither a monkey virus sequences or plasmid contaminant, it is a synthetic kit that can be bought by any legitimate laboratory. What it was doing in the SARS-Cov-2 genome, or vaccine, like the furin cleavage, should be a subject of an investigation and truth commission to restore public trust and confidence in science. The very basis of scientific method and objectivity is on trial here. The fact that employees at the NIH received $710m in Royalties from Pfizer and other vaccine makers is a pure scandal and slap in the face of public health ethics.
Science at it's best! Thank you David for your ongoing hard work!!!
That was a lot of good info. Will need t read that a few times.
This is a wonderful article - demystifying the hyperbole and speculation surrounding the PCR conspiracies.
It is so well articulated, for a lay person like me, to understand the nuance involved in qualifying the argument, and clarifies the misconceptions that have muddied the waters.
Most grateful for your time, effort, and intention to re-introduce solid foundational explanation to a bewildering subject. /\.
Prefer to hear that PCR is an assay where its use should only be an adjunct to full on diagnosis by an MD and not an AI or a biotech with a sample
Hey David! This was probably one of the more helpful things that Ive come across in this space, and so I subscribed here!
My son is 3 months old, so our situation is a bit different in that he's not even in school or daycare. Is there a similar framework for those who will be opting out of some of the childhood vaccines, versus the Covid jab?
... for sure You know how "plandemics" are confirmed using this test.
Here we meet a well-known virologist.
-
First past the post
https://www.nature.com/articles/423114a
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12736651/
Alison Abbott
Nature - Volume 423, page 114 (2003) - "SARS testing"
https://doi.org/10.1038/423114a
2003 May 8 (!) ( paywall )
„From the moment the mysterious illness known as SARS was declared a global threat to health, virologists were racing to develop a diagnostic test. Alison Abbott visits the tiny German lab that got there first.“
-
... and ff to SARS-Cough 2
Yes, Corman-Drosten et al designed a test based on a rumor
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/yes-corman-drosten-et-al-designed
Responses to Mike Yeadon
Jessica Hockett - Sep 03, 2025
-
... and prior to it - some more voices:
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
https://zenodo.org/records/4298004
Borger, Pieter - Malhotra, Rajesh Kumar - Yeadon, Michael - Craig, Clare - McKernan, Kevin - Steger, Klaus - McSheehy, Paul - Angelova, Lidiya - Franchi, Fabio - Binder, Thomas - Ullrich, Henrik - Ohashi, Makoto - Scoglio, Stefano - Doesburg-van Kleffens, Marjolein - Gilbert, Dorothea - Klement, Rainer Johannes - Schrüfer, Ruth - Pieksma, Berber W. - Bonte, Jan - Dalle Carbonare, Bruno H. - Corbett, Kevin - Kämmer, Ulrike
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4298004
Published November 30, 2020 | Version v1
-
Finaly:
Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html
22.01.2007
... und re-published (full-text)
NYT 2007: FAITH IN QUICK TEST LEADS TO EPIDEMIC THAT WASN’T
by Silviu "Silview" Costinescu
https://silview.media/2020/12/26/nyt-2007-faith-in-quick-test-leads-to-epidemic-that-wasnt/
-
You - fraud on the largest scale possible.
The grain of salt required when using PCR-Tests may measured in metric tons now.
Let me correct my sentence - and appologize:
"You see - fraud on the largest scale possible"
PCR should never again be used to determine a pandemic or health care crisis or underwrite healthcare mandates as a European Appeals court has already stated. SR40 is neither a monkey virus sequences or plasmid contaminant, it is a synthetic kit that can be bought by any legitimate laboratory. What it was doing in the SARS-Cov-2 genome, or vaccine, like the furin cleavage, should be a subject of an investigation and truth commission to restore public trust and confidence in science. The very basis of scientific method and objectivity is on trial here. The fact that employees at the NIH received $710m in Royalties from Pfizer and other vaccine makers is a pure scandal and slap in the face of public health ethics.